Legal Opinion

Burroughs v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 3, 1991No. 1484, September Term, 1990PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOYLAN, Judge.

This appeal basically involves the handling of a defense claim that a key State’s witness was a criminal accomplice and that his testimony should, therefore, have been subjected to the special strictures imposed upon that category of inherently suspect evidence. The appellants, Chris Lamont Burroughs and Rodney Hampton, were convicted by a Prince George’s County jury, presided over by Judge Audrey E. Melbourne, of murder aggravated to the first degree by virtue of a premeditated intent to kill, of the same murder alternatively aggravated to the first degree by virtue of its…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Watson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Lusby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. VarnellWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Wagner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  3. In Re Anthony W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. COLEMAN-FULLER v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Allen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API