Welsh v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Carrico
In this case, we consider (1) whether the trial court applied correct legal principles in determining whether the prosecution by state officials was tainted through improper use of immunized testimony, and (2) whether the evidence supported the trial court’s finding that the prosecution had met its burden of proving there was no taint.
From some time in the 1970s until convicted of the offenses involved in this appeal, the defendant, Richard E. Welsh, served as an accountant overseeing the financial activities of the National Caucus of Labor Committees (NCLC), an organization founded by Lyndon…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- United States v. CaporaleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lux v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- Billips v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
- Arthur C. Kreiger, II v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
- Billips v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
- Dwayne Ronald Harley v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.