Legal Opinion

Dynalectron Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 16, 1984No. 635-82CPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAYER, Judge.

Plaintiff Dynalectron Corporation is an unsuccessful bidder for a government contract. It claims entitlement to its bid preparation costs because the procurement was tainted by the bias of a procurement official and by the appearance of impropriety. Defendant says plaintiff has not established its proposal was not fairly and honestly considered or that the award of the contract resulted from wrongful government actions. The case is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment and defendant’s cross motion.

FACTS

On August 13, 1979, the Federal Railroad…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. CACI Field Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  2. Radva Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  3. Edelmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Smith MacHinery Company, Inc. v. Hesston CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  5. Hydro Engineering, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API