Legal Opinion

Smith MacHinery Company, Inc. v. Hesston Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 7, 1989No. 87-1597PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal, plaintiff Smith Machinery Corporation (Smith) argues that the district court improperly granted summary judgment against it on claims that Hesston Corporation violated section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and its New Mexico antitrust law counterpart by tying sales of Hesston tractors to sales of other Hes-ston farm machinery, and improperly dismissed its similar claim under section 3 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 14. Smith also contends that a related New Mexico state court decision precluded the federal district court’s grant of summary judgment…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Smith v. MaschnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  2. Smith v. MaschnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. Bishop v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  4. Clough v. RushCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. Reazin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API