Legal Opinion
Dinozzi v. Ohio State Dental Board, 08ap-609 (3-26-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 26, 2009No. 08AP-609PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Anthony DiNozzi, appeals from a judgment of the Ohio Court of Claims granting the Civ. R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss of defendant-appellee, Ohio State Dental Board. Plaintiff assigns a single error:
THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN PREMATURELY DISMISSING THE APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS, IN THE PURSUIT OF ECONOMIC RELIEF, FOR NEGLIGENCE UNDER OHIO LAW, WHEN SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE EXISTED THAT WOULD PROPERLY PROCEED TO TRIAL UNDER THE LAWS OF OHIO.
Because the Court of Claims properly determined plaintiff's complaint fails to state a claim upon…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Investors REIT One v. JacobsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Anderson v. Preferred Title & Guaranty Agency, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Pond v. E & E Towing & Recovery, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Anderson v. Preferred Title & Guaranty Agency, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014