Legal Opinion

Pikas v. Williams Companies, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 30, 2011No. Case No. 08-CV-101-GKF-PJCPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GREGORY K. FRIZZELL, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on the Motion to Reconsider the Court’s September 27, 2010 Opinion and Order (Dkt. # 76) of defendant The Williams Companies, Inc. (“Williams”) and plaintiffs’ Motion to Clarify and Confirm the Class Definition (Dkt. # 75).

I. Facts

Plaintiff Joseph Pikas (“Pikas”) filed this class action on behalf of himself and all others who took lump sum pension payments under the Williams Pension Plan (“Plan”). Pikas alleges the Plan illegally denied lump sum pension recipients the actuarial equivalent of a Cost of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Price v. PhilpotCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. John H. Held v. Manufacturers Hanover Leasing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  4. Monica M. Zipf v. American Telephone and Telegraph CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  5. Paul Miller v. Fortis Benefits Insurance Company and Resorts International HotelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gelesky v. AK Steel Corp. Pensions Agreement PlanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API