Legal Opinion
Gelesky v. AK Steel Corp. Pensions Agreement Plan
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 30, 2011No. Case No. 1:10-cv-899PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SANDRA S. BECKWITH, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff, Richard D. Gelesky, alleges in his complaint that Defendants, his former employer’s pension plan and its administrative committee, failed to properly calculate his lump-sum pension benefit. For himself and on behalf of a putative class, he brings claims under ERISA seeking additional benefits. (Doc. 1) Defendants, AK Steel Corporation Pension Agreement Plan and AK Steel Corporation Benefit Plan Administrative Committee, have moved to dismiss Plaintiffs claims as time-barred. (Doc. 11) Plaintiff opposes the motion (Doc. 18), and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Jones v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Peggy Greenberg and Pamela Rossmann, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated v. The Life Insurance Company of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schumacher v. AK Steel Corp. Retirement Accumulation Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Davis v. Retirement Plan of Phibro Animal Health Corp. & Subsidiaries & AffiliatesDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2012