Legal Opinion

State v. Bohlen

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 2009No. ED 46436-01PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICIA L. COHEN, Judge.

Introduction

Christopher Bohlen (“Defendant”) filed a motion to recall the mandate issued in this case asserting that his appellate counsel was ineffective because he failed to raise on appeal that one count of Defendant’s three count conviction for first degree robbery violated the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution. We granted the motion to permit Defendant to address the merits of his claim. See State v. Zweifel, 615 S.W.2d 470, 473 (Mo.App.1981). 1 We vacate Defendant’s judgment and sentence as to Count I.

Factual and Procedural Background

On…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Hagan v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. Tisius v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  4. State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  5. State v. ToombsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HortonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. State v. HicksSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  3. State v. JordanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State v. HicksSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API