Legal Opinion
MR. X v. McCorkle
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 6, 1970No. Civ. A. 1242-69, 1349-69PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs 1 in both these class actions seek to invalidate New Jersey’s “Administrative Ceiling” regulations of the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program of that state. Section 615 of the Categorical Assistance Budget Manual. They allege such regulations violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, contravene sections 402(a) (7), 402(a) (8) and 406(b) of the Social Security Act of 1935, 42 U.S.C. § 602(a) (7), 42 U.S.C. § 602(a) (8), 42 U.S.C. § 606(b), as amended, and conflict with certain HEW…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Street v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Jefferson v. HackneySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Shea v. VialpandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Serritella v. EngelmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1972
- Gurley v. WohlgemuthDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Steere v. State, Department of Public WelfareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.