Legal Opinion

Brown v. Lance Ringstad & Central Installation Co.

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided June 17, 1992No. 4-89-CV-20865PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MARK W. BENNETT, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION.

This matter is before the court pursuant to Defendants’ Motion to Quash Notice of Videotape Deposition of Dr. Doro and Brief in Support of Motion to Quash Videotape Deposition of Dr. Doro filed on May 28, 1992. The Plaintiff filed her Resistance to Motion to Quash Notice of Videotape Deposition of Dr. Doro on June 9, 1992.

The issue presented by these motions is whether a party may depose an opposing party’s expert medical witness who has conducted a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35(a) physical examination, but which the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harry E. Hoover v. The United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Garner v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1973
  3. Baki v. B. F. Diamond Construction Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1976
  4. Alston v. Greater Southeast Community HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985
  5. Ver Dell Cox as Debtor in Possession of the Estate of Ver Dell Cox, Etc. v. Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. White v. Vanderbilt UniversityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  2. House v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
  3. Pope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. Beauchamp v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Peters v. NelsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API