Legal Opinion

Brown v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n

California Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1902No. S.F. No. 2123PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

The action was brought by plaintiffs, the widow and children of one Thomas Brown, to recover the amount of a certificate of insurance issued by defendant upon the' life of Brown, and payable on his death to his widow and children. The findings and judgment of the court were in favor of defendant, and plaintiffs appeal from the judgment upon the judgment-roll alone.

The findings are responsive to the issues, and are to the effect that Thomas Brown failed to comply with the conditions of his contract, failed to pay a certain mortuary call when due, and permitted his policy to lapse and become…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pico v. CuyasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Gill v. DriverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Wood v. PendolaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. McCueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Fitzpatrick v. UnderwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Vasey v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  4. Breeze v. International Banking Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Enterprise Foundry Co. v. PollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API