Legal Opinion
Clark v. City of Kent
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 16, 2007No. 57359-4-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
150 P.3d 161 (2007)
Thomas A. CLARK; Jeff Cobb; Todd P. Durham; John A. Pagel, Jr.; and Paul Peter, individuals and as representatives of a class of overtime eligible employees of the City of Kent Police Department, Respondents,
v.
CITY OF KENT, a political subdivision of the state of Washington, Appellant.
No. 57359-4-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
January 16, 2007.
Bruce L. Schroeder, Elizabeth Rose Butle Kennar, Denise L. Ashbaugh, Seattle, WA, for Appellant City of Kent.
William B. Aitchison, Mark A. Crabtree, Portland, OR, Jeffrey Julius, Hilary H. McClure, Seattle, WA, for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Allison v. Housing Authority of City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Champagne v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Champagne v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Raz Yaron, V. Sierra ConleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- Almquist v. City of RedmondCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Almquist v. City of RedmondCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007