Legal Opinion

Soolook v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1968No. 908PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

After trial by jury Reginald Soolook was found guilty of the crime of murder in the second degree. 1 Appellant was thereafter sentenced to life imprisonment. The primary issue in this appeal involves the trial court’s admission into evidence of two separate confessions which were made by appellant. It is argued that these confessions should have been excluded because prior to appellant’s confessions the law enforcement authorities involved failed to comply with the criteria announced in Miranda v. State of Arizona. 2

The record shows that on the morning of February…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Love v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Commonwealth v. MeehanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Erickson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. City of Nome v. AilakAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. LandghamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API