Legal Opinion

Knowles v. Kasiska

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1928No. 4866PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action by residuary legatee on the bond of executor to recover her share and that of another legatee distributed to them by decree of the probate court. The cause was tried upon the complaint as amended and a second or amended answer, to a jury, and, at the conclusion of the testimony, both plaintiff and defendants moved for an instructed verdict. The court thereupon instructed a verdict for plaintiff. The executor was not served with process, and the defendant sureties appeal from the judgment. Appellants offered no testimony.

The principal contention is that the sureties are not liable…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hahn v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. In re Estate of GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Clark v. RossierIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  4. State v. Fong LoonIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Bellinger v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1894

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Short v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Harkness v. Utah Power & Light Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Dunn v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Ferguson v. ConnellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Walker Bank & Trust Co. v. SteelyIdaho Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API