Legal Opinion

Harkness v. Utah Power & Light Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1930No. 5564PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

PI. O. Iiarkness died April 5, 1911, leaving property in Bannock and Oneida counties. Plis widow, Sarah Iiarkness, having qualified as administratrix and having found it necessary to sell part of the estate to pay debts, secured an order directing the sale of a certain electric light plant at McCammon, Idaho. At the ensuing sale which was confirmed by the probate court of Bannock county on August 10, 1914, respondent, Utah Power & Light Company, became the purchaser. Some fifteen years thereafter appel lants, who were minor devisees at the time of the sale, brought an action in the district…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Clark v. RossierIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Harpold v. DoyleIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Smith v. CollisMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Calvert v. CalvertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  5. Swinehart v. TurnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mason v. PelkesIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Bruun v. HansonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  3. Spencer v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Walker Bank & Trust Co. v. SteelyIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Davenport v. SimonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API