Legal Opinion
Dunn v. Boise City
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided December 26, 1929No. 5283PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVarian, J.
— Action for damages caused by flooding the premises of plaintiff and his assignor in January, 1925. The case was heretofore reversed on appeal from a judgment of nonsuit, wherein this court construed the sufficiency of the notice of damage required to be given the city under C. S., sec. 3847. (Dunn v. Boise City, 45 Ida. 362, 262 Pac. 507, 508.)
Hull’s Gulch and Slaughterhouse Gulch, through which water from rain and melting snows drains from the foothills lying north and east of Boise, are natural drainage courses. Many years ago private citizens constructed certain flumes and other works to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Fort Wayne v. CoombsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- McCarthy v. . the City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Miller v. Village of MullanIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Willson v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
- Dunn v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Skaggs Drug Centers, Inc. v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- CC Anderson Stores Co. v. Boise Water CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
- Olson v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Splinter v. City of NampaIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
- Lundahl v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.