Legal Opinion
Hair v. Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided April 29, 1992No. 3-91-0154PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HIGGINS, District Judge.
The Court has before it the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation entered March 9, 1992 (Docket Entry No. 82); plaintiff’s objections to the Report and Recommendation (filed March 23,1992; Docket Entry No. 84) and response of the defendants, Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System and its Board of Trustees (filed April 2, 1992; Docket Entry No. 87).
The plaintiff’s objections raise no new issues not considered by the Magistrate Judge and they are overruled. The Magistrate presented a well reasoned analysis and his Report and Recommendation is adopted and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ernst v. RisingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Hutto v. South Carolina Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Hutto v. South Carolina Retirement SystemDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
- American International Specialty Lines Insurance Co. v. Reimer & Roger Assoc., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Ernst v. RisingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.