Legal Opinion
Moore v. Glickman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 7, 1997No. 95-17435PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Barbara Moore appeals the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendants in her Bivens action alleging violations of her federal constitutional rights. We review de novo, Saul v. United States, 928 F.2d 829, 832 (9th Cir.1991), and we affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Barbara Moore filed this action against the Secretary of Agriculture, eight officials of the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service (“ASCS”), and four officials of the Agriculture Department’s Office of Inspector General (“OIG”), for alleged constitutional violations…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Nunez v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Navab-Safavi v. Broadcasting Board of GovernorsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Blankenship v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- XP Vehicles, Inc. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Libas Ltd. v. CarilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.