Legal Opinion

Hadhazi v. Zero Ice Corporation

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1937No. Appeal, 138PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for the loss of her husband, who was struck by an automobile belonging to defendant and died from the resulting injuries. The court below entered a compulsory non-suit, on the ground that no negligence of the driver was shown. From the refusal to take off the nonsuit, plaintiff brings this appeal.

Deceased was seen before he was struck, about the middle of a thirty-feet-wide street, not at an intersection, about ten o’clock in the morning of a clear day. The street was straight. Just where the man came from was not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McAvoy v. KromerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Pfendler v. SpeerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Sajatovich v. Traction Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Purdy v. HazeltineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Whalen, Admrx. v. Yellow Cab CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. MarateckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Brooks v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Paddock v. ToneWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Wright v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Mehra v. BentzDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API