Legal Opinion

Mehra v. Bentz

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 3, 1975No. 72 C 787Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PLATT, District Judge.

Defendants move pursuant to Rule 50 (b) and (c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for a judgment notwithstanding a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $10,000 on plaintiff’s first claim and $69,500 on *649plaintiff’s second claim on the grounds that: (i) there was no evidence of negligence on the part of the defendants, and (ii) plaintiff’s intestate was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

At the close of the evidence offered by the plaintiff and at the close of all of the evidence defendants moved to dismiss on the foregoing…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. McAvoy v. KromerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Auel v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Pfendler v. SpeerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Dando v. BrobstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Sajatovich v. Traction Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API