Mehra v. Bentz
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PLATT, District Judge.
Defendants move pursuant to Rule 50 (b) and (c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for a judgment notwithstanding a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $10,000 on plaintiff’s first claim and $69,500 on *649plaintiff’s second claim on the grounds that: (i) there was no evidence of negligence on the part of the defendants, and (ii) plaintiff’s intestate was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.
At the close of the evidence offered by the plaintiff and at the close of all of the evidence defendants moved to dismiss on the foregoing…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- McAvoy v. KromerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Auel v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Pfendler v. SpeerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Dando v. BrobstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Sajatovich v. Traction Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.