Legal Opinion
Short v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided September 23, 1981No. 102-63PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, Chief Judge
In this suit, some 3,800 individuals who claim to be Indians of the Hoopa Valley Indian Reservation in Northern California (the Reservation) seek to recover their shares in the income from the sale of Reservation timber that the government distributed exclusively to another group of Indians of the Reservation. In Short v. United States, 202 Ct. Cl. 870, 486 F.2d 561 (1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 961 (1974) (the 1973 decision), we held the government liable to qualified Indians of the Reservation who were entitled to but did not receive shares in this income, and we rendered judgment in favor…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Helex Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- United States v. Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa IndiansUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Short v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Central Soya Company, Inc. v. Geo. A. Hormel & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Jamesbury Corp. v. Litton Industrial Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Mendenhall v. Barber-Greene Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Shermoen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.