Legal Opinion

Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 2005PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.

The Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (Bureau) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) granting the application of Consolidated Freightways, Inc. (Employer) for Supersedeas Fund reimbursement. In doing so, the Board affirmed the decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) that Employer was entitled to Supersedeas Fund reimbursement after it successfully defeated a claimant’s request for reinstatement. The issue presented for our review is whether an employer is entitled to reimbursement of benefits that relate to a work…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robb, Leonard & Mulvihill v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Wausau Insurance Companies v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Moore v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mark v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Forbes Road CTC v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Bureau v. WCAB (CONSOL. FREIGHTWAYS)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. J.P. Lamb Construction, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API