Legal Opinion

Wilcolator Co. v. Robertshaw Thermostat Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1939No. 8911PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, District Judge.

The plaintiff seeks to recover royalties which it alleges are due under a patent license agreement. In the agreement defendant was authorized to use Patent No. 1,978,362, and applications for patents Nos. 575,525 and 650,255. The patent and applications relate to a thermostatic regulator of the hydraulic type.

The defendant admits the agreement, and that it has been, and still is, making thermostats covered by the patent and applications and marking them as so covered, but denies liability under the terms of the agreement. Upon trial it advanced defenses under three…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kant-Skore Piston Co. v. Sinclair Mfg. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cold Metal Process Co. v. McLouth Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
  2. Perbal v. Dazor Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Free-Flow Muffler Company v. KliewerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. deStubner v. United Carbon Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Specialties Development Corp. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API