Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Rice
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 29, 1953No. 5 Div. 562PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
We have here the same question of law as we had in Ex parte Rice, 258 Ala. 132, 61 So.2d 7, and between the same parties. It appears that after the petition was denied in that proceeding petitioner amended his answer and then sought to have interrogatories answered, such as were submitted before.
Reference is made to the case of Rice v. Sinclair Refining Co., 256 Ala. 565, 56 So.2d 647, as well as to Ex parte Rice, supra, for the situation as it now appears in connection with the amended answer.
So that the question now, as then, is whether the answer presents a valid defense to the equity of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Grosjean v. American Press Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Bement v. National Harrow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. HatasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Seven Up Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Abbott Laboratories v. DurrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- In Re NASDAQ Market Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.