Legal Opinion
Blue Bird Food Products Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 19, 1974No. 73-1684 through 73-1687PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
This appeal, which brings these parties before this court for the second time, 1 involves four actions 2 filed by plaintiff-consignee, Blue Bird Food Products Co. (Blue Bird), against defendant-carrier, Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company (B&O), for alleged damage to four carloads of fresh hams shipped by midwest meat packers via defendant to plaintiff in Philadelphia. The action is brought under the Car-mack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 20(11). The issue presented is whether the introduction of a bill of lading with the notation,
Received, subject to…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Republic Arloading and Distributing Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Blue Bird Food Products Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Dugdale Packing Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1972
- Bluebird Food Products Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Tuschman v. Pennsylvania RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
4Cited by19 opinions
- Beta Spawn, Inc. v. Ffe Transportation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Daniels v. Hadley Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- American Foreign Insurance Association v. Seatrain Lines of Puerto Rico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- The Pillsbury Company v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Ed Miniat, Inc. v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.