Legal Opinion
Rutledge v. United Services Life Ins.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 25, 1948No. Nos. 9653-9656PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDGERTON, Circuit Judge.
Appellee United Services Life Insurance Company employed United Services Sales Department, Inc., as its exclusive general agent. The Sales company employed individual agents or solicitors. These included the present appellants. The contracts between -the Sales company and the appellants plainly were not intended to, and did not, create any relation or obligation between appellants and appellee Insurance Company. They did not mention the Insurance Company.
Appellants sold, for the Sales company, life insurance policies in the Insurance Company. The Insurance Company paid…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vail v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Lanowah Investment Co. v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942
- Lester v. New York Life InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Union Casualty & Surety Co. v. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1902
- Vail v. Northwestern Mutual Life Ins.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Keeshan v. Embassy Investment CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
- Michael D. Marcus v. National Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Weinberg & Bush, Inc. v. MurrayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1960