Legal Opinion
Steiner v. Thexton
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 28, 2008No. C054605Published
1Opinion of the Court
163 Cal.App.4th 359 (2008)
MARTIN A. STEINER, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
PAUL THEXTON, as Trustee, etc., Defendant and Respondent; SIDDIQUI FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, Intervener and Appellant.
No. C054605.
Court of Appeals of California, Third District.
May 28, 2008.
Law Office of Robert Vaughan and Robert Vaughan for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Law Office of Klaus J. Kolb and Klaus J. Kolb for Intervener and Appellant.
Law Office of David L. Price and David L. Price for Defendant and Respondent.
OPINION
SIMS, Acting P. J.
In this action seeking specific performance of a real estate sales agreement, the hopeful…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.