Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lasley v. Combined Transport, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 2011No. CC 0608-08260; CA A137222; SC S058762Published

1DissentDe Muniz, C. J.

Evidence adduced in the course of a civil trial does not arise in a vacuum. It is circumscribed by the content of the parties’ respective pleadings, a fact that requires litigants in Oregon to plead the ultimate facts on which their claims are based. See ORCP 18 A (pleadings must contain a “plain and concise statement of the ultimate facts constituting a claim for relief’); see also Welch v. Bancorp, 296 Or 208, 221, 675 P2d 172 (1984) (“The necessity of pleading ultimate facts retains the present Oregon requirements of pleading facts at a fairly specific level.”) (internal quotation marks…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Ritter v. BEALSOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Welch v. Bancorp Management Advisors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Robinson v. Lamb's Wilsonville ThriftwayOregon Supreme Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API