Legal Opinion

Hester v. Thomson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1904No. 4990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered September 8, 1903, dismissing the action, upon sustaining a demurrer to the petition.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

Appellant brought this action against respondents, and seeks a writ of mandate to compel respondents to adjust the matter of appellant’s application for a permit to erect a livery and feed stable, and to issue a permit to erect such building upon certain property described as follows: Lots 1 and 4, in block 36, of C. D. Boren’s addition to the city of Seattle. An alternative writ of mandate was issued, and the respondents thereupon moved to quash the writ> for the reason that the petition does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The motion was granted, and, the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Livermore v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Puget Mill Co. v. DuecyWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Lea v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Fey v. Rossi Improvement CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API