Legal Opinion

Twenty-Four Collection, Inc. v. M. Weinbaum Construction, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 15, 1983No. 82-938, 82-1258 and 82-1468PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

427 So.2d 1110 (1983)

The TWENTY-FOUR COLLECTION, INC., Appellant,

v.

M. WEINBAUM CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellee.

Nos. 82-938, 82-1258 and 82-1468.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 15, 1983.

Lapidus & Stettin and Richard L. Lapidus, Miami, for appellant.

Pertnoy, Greenberg & Sobel and Stuart H. Sobel, Miami, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.

DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.

We reverse the final judgment entered in favor of M. Weinbaum Construction, Inc. and remand the cause for further proceedings.

The trial court, after a non-jury trial, entered a money…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lovett and Lovett v. LovettSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. Hospital Mortg. Group v. First Prudential Dev.Supreme Court of Florida · 1982
  3. Mori v. MATSUSHITA ELEC. CORP., ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Babe, Inc. v. Baby's Formula Service, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  5. Carrig v. Gilbert-Varker Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Chamberlin v. Puckett ConstructionMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Rosenberg v. Guardian Life Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Fairview Properties v. Pate Const. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. Salkin v. Palm Beach International, Inc. (In Re Maxko Petroleum, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2010
  5. A.I.C. Trading Corp. v. SusmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API