Legal Opinion

Maunders v. Hanks

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 17, 1925No. 280PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarcus, J.

Appellee instituted this suit against appellant to recover $474.56, which he claimed was the balance due him for “certain team work, horse hire, and labor” which he performed for appellant at the rate of $15 per day per team for hauling and team work and $6 per day for the use of saddle horses. He alleged that the total amount of work performed was $2,674.50, and he had been paid $2,200. Appellant answered by plea of payment, and for cross-action alleged that ap-pellee was to work at the rate of $15 per day, and that he had by mistake overpaid him on said basis $180. He further alleged that,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hall v. Williams EllisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Milwaukee Gold Extraction Co. v. GordonMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Wilcox v. BergmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Newsom v. LangfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  5. Baker v. SparksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Newton County v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API