Maunders v. Hanks
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtBarcus, J.
Appellee instituted this suit against appellant to recover $474.56, which he claimed was the balance due him for “certain team work, horse hire, and labor” which he performed for appellant at the rate of $15 per day per team for hauling and team work and $6 per day for the use of saddle horses. He alleged that the total amount of work performed was $2,674.50, and he had been paid $2,200. Appellant answered by plea of payment, and for cross-action alleged that ap-pellee was to work at the rate of $15 per day, and that he had by mistake overpaid him on said basis $180. He further alleged that,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hall v. Williams EllisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Milwaukee Gold Extraction Co. v. GordonMontana Supreme Court · 1908
- Wilcox v. BergmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Newsom v. LangfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Baker v. SparksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Newton County v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941