Legal Opinion

County of Los Angeles v. Commission on State Mandates

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1995No. B080938PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS (Fred), J.

I

Factual and Procedural Summary

A. Procedural.

On December 22, 1992, appellant filed its first amended verified petition for writ of mandate. In its petition, appellant sought a peremptory writ of mandate compelling respondent Commission on State Mandates (the Commission) to vacate its determination that Penal Code section 1 987.9 did not constitute a state mandate, for which the state was obligated to reimburse appellant pursuant to article XIII B, section 6, of the California Constitution. The petition also named as real parties in interest, State Controller Gray Davis,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. People v. FriersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Bowers v. BernardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Keenan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. County of San Diego v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Department of Finance v. Commission on State MandatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  4. City of San Jose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. San Diego Unified School District v. Commision on State MandatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API