Legal Opinion

Fipps v. Day

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 2022No. 111633PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Fipps v. Day,

2022-Ohio-3434.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA THEODIS FIPPS, : Relator, : No. 111633 v. : CHRISTOPHER E. DAY, : Respondent. : JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION JUDGMENT: COMPLAINT DISMISSED RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: September 27, 2022 Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 558076 Appearances: Theodis Fipps, pro se. Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Matthew T. Fitzsimmons, IV, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent. MARY J. BOYLE, J.: Theodis Fipps, the relator, has filed an amended complaint for a writ of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State ex rel. Heller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State ex rel. Everhart v. McIntoshOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Blodgett v. BlodgettOhio Supreme Court · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. McAlpinOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. Starner v. OndaOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. Bedford City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. State v. A.K.H.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. State ex rel. Goldschmidt v. TriggsOhio Supreme Court · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API