Legal Opinion

Baxter v. Heimann

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 1908PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court.— Eon. D. D. Fisher, Judge. (1) “If a lessor acquiesce in the tenancy by accepting rent of the premises after knowledge that a breach of condition has been committed, he will be presumed to have waived the forfeiture (Ireland v. Nichols, 46 N. Y. 413; McGlynn v. Moore, 25 Cal. 384; Coon v. Brickett, 2 N. H. 163), but to have that effect, it must be rent which became due after the breach.”

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court.— Eon. D. D. Fisher, Judge. (1) “If a lessor acquiesce in the tenancy by accepting rent of the premises after knowledge that a breach of condition has been committed, he will be presumed to have waived the forfeiture (Ireland v. Nichols, 46 N. Y. 413; McGlynn v. Moore, 25 Cal. 384; Coon v. Brickett, 2 N. H. 163), but to have that effect, it must be rent which became due after the breach.” Mart, on Conv., sec. 340; Co. Litt., 211b; Bleeker v. Smith; 13 Wend. 530; Hunter v. Osterholdt, 11 Barb. 33; Jackson v. Allen, 3 Cow. 220; Gomber v. Hackett, 6 Wis.…

1Opinion of the CourtGoode, J.

On July 20, 1902, plaintiff leased to defendant a building at the southwest corner of Lucas avenue and Seventh street in the city of St. Louis, for a term of five years, to commence on said 'date and at a yearly rental of $4,000, payable in monthly installments of $333.33 1-3, in advance, for which defendant executed his sixty promissory notes under date of July *26211, 1902, falling dne on successive months thereafter. The notes contained this clause: “Subject to and in accordance with the provisions of the lease this day made for the leasehold at the corner of Seventh and Lucas.” Defendant took…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guffy v. HukillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Walker v. EnglerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  3. Alexander v. HodgesMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Kramer v. AmbergNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Read v. TuttleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1868

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gary Realty Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  2. Wilson v. AgnewColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Weaver Mining Co. v. GuthrieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Hinsman v. Marble Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  5. Hamre v. Michael Etzel & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API