Legal Opinion

Reichert v. Sheridan

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 23, 1995No. 14970PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The principal issue in this certified appeal is whether General Statutes § 31-293 of the Workers’ Compensation Act1 bars the independent *252action of an employee against a third party tortfeasor if the employee, after proper notice, does not join an action commenced against the tortfeasor by his employer. The plaintiff, Francis Reichert, brought an action to recover damages for the personal injuries that he had sustained when he was struck by a truck driven by the defendant, James J. Sheridan, Jr. The trial court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, in which the defendant claimed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whisper Wind Development Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Sharp v. Wyatt, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Siller v. SillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. Talton v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Board of Education v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. WielerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. State v. RobinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Worsham v. GreifenbergerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. State v. ByrdSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Fields v. Housing Authority of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API