Legal Opinion

State v. Wieler

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 20, 1995No. 15091PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

The only issue in this certified appeal is whether, for the purposes of the crime of larceny by embezzlement under General Statutes § 53a-119, the term “appropriation,” as defined in General Statutes § SSa-llS,1 requires proof of an intent permanently to deprive the victims of their property. The defendant, *554Philip F. Wieler II, was charged, in two informations, with twenty-three counts of larceny in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-122 (a) (2)2 and two counts of larceny in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-123 (a) (2).3 After a jury trial, he was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. LeonardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Talton v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. State v. WielerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  4. Reichert v. SheridanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. State v. WielerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wala v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  2. State v. SpillaneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  3. Mendez v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  4. State v. OrtizConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. State v. McClendonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API