Legal Opinion

Sprott v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 2, 1964No. 20366PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutton

Michael Sprott, age 5, by his mother and next friend, Lois Sprott, filed a malpractice action against Claude O. Roberts, an anesthesiologist, and Philip P. Pyles, a dentist. Service of process was had only on Dr. Roberts.

The complaint in its first claim in substance alleged that Michael had been taken by his mother to Dr. Pyles for dental work, that Dr. Pyles engaged Dr. Roberts to administer an anesthetic. Also, that as a direct result of the negligence and carelessness of both doctors in administering the anesthetic Michael suffered serious brain damage and related disabilities. The second…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Spomer v. City of Grand JunctionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  4. Gayton v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  5. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Davidson v. DillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  2. Espinoza v. O'DELLSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Warne v. HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  4. Contract Maintenance Co. v. Local No. 105, Building Service Employees International UnionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  5. Passe v. MitchellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API