Pure Oil Co. v. Ruthsatz
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
RAYMOND, District Judge.
There exists diversity of citizenship of the parties; the matter in controversy as to the unfair competition cause of action exceeds, exclusive of interest and costs, the sum or value of $3000; the defendants are residents of this district; and the acts complained of have been committed by the defendants within this district.
Plaintiff is the lawful owner of Design Letters Patent No. 77,857, in suit, together with all rights of action for past infringement thereof.
The design of said patent is not disclosed by the prior art.
Plaintiff is marketing its petroleum products…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Applied Arts Corp. v. Grand Rapids Metalcraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- White Tower System, Inc. v. White Castle System of Eating Houses Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- Yellow Cab Co. v. CreasmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Protex Signal Co. v. FenigerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nissen Trampoline Co. v. International Tram-po-line Manufacturers, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960