Legal Opinion

Sayer v. Bashaw

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 2009No. S-12966PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal turns on the validity of a defendant's offer of judgment that required dismissal of the lawsuit, but did not provide for entry of judgment. The plaintiff did not accept the defendant's pretrial offer to pay $10,111 in exchange for immediate dismissal with prejudice. The defendant prevailed at trial, but the superior court denied his motion for enhanced attorney's fees under Alaska Civil Rule 68. He argues here that he made a valid offer of judgment. Because a valid offer of judgment in Alaska must allow for entry of judgment, not merely…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. American Airlines, Inc. v. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Lowell v. HayesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Fernandes v. PortwineAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Goodstein v. Bank of San PedroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. RODERER v. DashAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Asrc Energy Services Power v. Golden Valley Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Dixon v. BlackwellAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Dixon v. BlackwellAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Dixon v. BlackwellAlaska Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API