In re the Claim of Childs
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*1071Many of the pertinent facts of this case, in which claimant challenges a determination disqualifying her from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that she lost employment through misconduct, are set forth in our prior decision (Matter of Childs [Kaleida Health—Commissioner of Labor], 42 AD3d 620 [2007]). Subsequent to our decision, claimant applied to reopen her case in August 2007 and that request was denied by a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board filed on October 15, 2007. Thereafter, claimant entered into a settlement agreement with the employer to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re ChanthyasackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of BriemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- In Re the Claim of BriemNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- In re the Claim of NapolitanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Claim of LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Claim of CedeñoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Matter of Leone (Woodmere Florist, Ltd.--Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- In re the Claim of CerickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re the Claim of CerickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.