Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Cincinnati Gear Co.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided July 24, 2003No. 03-13441PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO ENFORCE STAY

JEFFERY P. HOPKINS, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) (Doc. 15) filed by the Cincinnati Gear Company (“CGC”) and the Emergency Motion of Petitioning Creditor to Enforce Stay of State Court Proceedings (“Emergency Motion”) (Doc. 20) filed by Navatek, Ltd. (“Navatek”). A hearing on the motions was held on June 27, 2003. Because bankruptcy would not provide CGC creditors ■with greater protections than they already possess outside of bankruptcy the Court will grant the Motion…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Remex Electronics Ltd. v. Axl Industries, Inc. (In Re Axl Industries, Inc.)District Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
  2. Barnett v. Edwards (In Re Edwards)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. In Re Bailey's Beauticians Supply Company, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. In Re Deacon Plastics MacHine, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
  5. In Re Artists' Outlet, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re International Zinc Coatings & Chemical Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  2. In re DzierzawskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
  3. In Re: Nash Engineering CoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
  4. In re: Eunice MurrayUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2026
  5. In re: Nash Engineering CoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API