Legal Opinion
PECO Energy Co. v. Philadelphia Suburban Water Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 26, 2002PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTodd, J.
¶ 1 Philadelphia Suburban Water Company (“PSWC”) appeals the order entered May 25, 2001 by the Honorable Nitza Qui-nones Alejandro of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County overruling its preliminary objections to venue in Philadelphia County. 1 Following our thorough review of the record before us, we reverse and remand.
¶2 The relevant facts and procedural history of this matter are as follows. On January 5, 2001, PECO Electric Company (“PECO”) filed a civil action against PSWC in Philadelphia County alleging that it sustained pecuniary losses as the result of an alleged rupture of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shambe v. Delaware Hudson R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Purcell v. Bryn Mawr HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Masel v. GlassmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Shears v. RigleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Boyce v. St. Paul Property & Liability InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kring v. University of PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Searles v. EstradaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Golab, D. v. Knuth, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Deutschbauer v. BarakatSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Hangey, R. v. Husqvarna Professional ProductsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.