Legal Opinion

Williams & Cochrane, LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Indian Reservation

District Court, S.D. California

Decided April 22, 2020No. 3:17-cv-01436Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAMS & COCHRANE, LLP, Case No.: 17-CV-01436-GPC-MSB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 14 ROBERT ROSETTE; ROSETTE & ASSOCIATES, PC; ROSETTE, LLP; 15 [ECF No. 235]; QUECHAN TRIBE OF THE FORT 16 YUMA INDIAN RESERVATION, a GRANTING MOTION TO FILE federally-recognized Indian tribe; and 17 DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL DOES 1 THROUGH 100, 18 Defendants. [ECF No. 221]; 19 DENYING MOTION FOR 20 SANCTIONS 21 [ECF No. 254]. 22 23 Before the Court is…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Jose Chavez v. James ZiglarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Fleming v. PickardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API