Toledo, St. L. & W. R. v. Kountz
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio.
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, District Judge.
The defendant in error, plaintiff below, sued to recover damages on account of the death of his intestate, which is alleged to have been caused by his being run over by the defendant’s yard train, in consequence of the catching of his foot in a frog, connected with a switch which was unblocked. Plaintiff’s petition alleged negligence in the operation of the engine, in failing to have a headlight on the engine, and in running the train at an unlawful rate of speed. It also alleged a violation of section 3365 — 18 of the Revised Statutes of Ohio, which requires every…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Insurance Co. v. BoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Scheffer v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Narramore v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- Cole v. German Savings & Loan Soc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Terminal R. Ass'n of St. Louis v. FitzjohnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Southern Ry. Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Cook-O'Brien Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Illinois Cent. R. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- William Harvey Porter v. American Export Lines, Inc. v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.