Westinghouse Co. v. Boyle
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingham; Wiest, J. Assumpsit by the Westinghouse Company against James Boyle on certain promissory notes. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
These two cases were tried as one before a, jury, and verdict directed by the court in favor .of defendant. It appears that in 1891 defendant bought a bean thresher of plaintiff for $430, giving a chattel mortgage-thereon for the full amount, together with his three promissory notes for $143.33 each, due respectively as follows :. December 28, 1891, September 28, 1892, and September-28, 1893, — with interest from maturity. These notes-were secured by the chattel mortgage. Defendant paid the first note at the time it became due. In September, 1893, plaintiff called on defendant for payment of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jewett v. PetitMichigan Supreme Court · 1857
- Home Life Insurance v. ElwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Parsons v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Lester v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Blair v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by5 opinions
- Berry v. Oklahoma State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Union Stockyards National Bank of South Omaha v. MaikaWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
- Myers v. Muskegon Improvement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Bosler v. McShaneNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
- Innoncente v. GuistiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1945