Legal Opinion

Shaw v. McDougall

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1936No. 6307PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

This action was commenced in this court to procure a review of an order made by defendant denying plaintiff’s motion to dismiss an appeal to the district court, taken on questions of both law and fact, by Wm. A. Strong, Charles McLachlan and Mrs. A. T. Jones, from a decree of the probate court of Teton County, made and entered on petition of Carl E. Hiatt, wherein it was adjudged and decreed that he and Mary E. Hiatt were married January 22, 1906; that thereafter, during their relationship as husband and wife and while living together as such, they acquired real estate and persona] property…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Epperson v. HowellIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Mills v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Short v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  4. On RehearingIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Paul v. ArmstrongNevada Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lockard v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Craft v. BalderstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Gramm v. LincolnIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  4. In Re Lincoln's EstateIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Lower Payette Ditch Co. v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API