On Rehearing
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.
A rehearing was granted in this case and the canse was argued orally, and all the questions presented by the appeal have been fully considered by the court. Coun*66sel contend that the original opinion fails to pass upon a number of questions presented by the record, and that on other questions considered by the court a correct conclusion was not reached. We have, therefore, deemed it advisable to take up all the assignments of error and decide them. The facts are-stated in the opinion delivered by Justice Sullivan.
When the cause reached the district court on appeal upon-questions of both law…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In re the Estate of JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Clark v. RossierIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
- Wickersham v. ComerfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Diaz v. Eighth Judicial District Court of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Mills v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Short v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
- State ex rel. Peterson v. DunlapIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
- Fraser v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
- Miller v. Lewiston National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
- In re the Estate of ChristensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.