Legal Opinion

Craft v. Balderston

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1938No. 6514PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

This proceeding has been designated, in the district court and here, as follows: “In the Matter of the Revocation of License of Doctor Russell Rtifus Craft.” It was brought to the district court by application, in the form of an affidavit, by Dr. Craft, wherein he sought to have Em-mitt Pfost, then commissioner of law enforcement of the state of Idaho, required to certify a transcript to the district court of all proceedings had before him, resulting in the cancellation of the doctor’s license to practice medicine and surgery. The case in the district court should have been entitled “Russell…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re EdwardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Cohen v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Epperson v. HowellIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Shaw v. McDougallIdaho Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Bd. of Medical Examiners v. WeinerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  2. Board of Medical Examiners v. BuckOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. In Re the License of FanelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  4. Withers v. Golding, Director Dept. of RegistrationUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Board of Medical Examiners v. BuckOregon Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API