Legal Opinion
Bouyea v. United States
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 12, 2003No. 3:96 CR 00047 AVC; No. 3:00 CV 01898 AVCPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON THE PETITIONER’S MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT THE SENTENCE
COVELLO, District Judge.
This is a motion brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 challenging the constitutionality of the trial proceedings that led to the petitioner’s conviction for wire fraud and bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 1344. The petitioner seeks to vacate the sentence imposed by the court on February 12, 1997, and a new trial.'
The issues presented are: (1) whether the court constitutionally impaired the trial proceedings that led to the petitioner’s conviction by charging the jury that the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Sean Lamar Sanders, A/K/A Sean Lamont SandersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hsu v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Bouyea v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Bouyer v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003