Cohen v. Thoft

845 A.2d 1281 (2004)

368 N.J. Super. 338

George N. COHEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Kirsten THOFT, Ted Nadeau and Princeton Borough Zoning Board of Adjustment, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 21, 2004.

Decided April 19, 2004.

George N. Cohen, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Christopher S. Tarr, Princeton, argued the cause for respondents Kirsten Thoft and Ted Nadeau (Smith, Stratton, Wise, Heher & Brennan, attorneys; Mr. Tarr, of counsel; F. Clifford Gibbons, on the brief).

William T. Sutphin, Princeton, argued the cause for respondent…